35k unique visitors in the last 3 days

AT&T Aims to End 10-Year Billing Dispute

US communication provider AT&T has offered to settle a class action lawsuit over disputed billing by AT&T Mobility, a business which AT&T bought in 2004. The class action lawsuit covers charges that were not authorized or understood by customers, and claims that AT&T Mobility violated consumer protection laws. Disputed charges cover a variety of services, some of which date back to 1999. There were four types of contentious charges made: for data services; for international services; a 'universal connectivity charge'; and for phone calls charged in a billing period after the call was made. However, after 10 years the settlement offered is relatively small: between USD7 and USD10 for each type of disputed service, so that if a customer was disputing all four types of charge they would receive a total of USD33 to drop their legal claim.You can read about the story here and visit AT&T's settlement website here.After 10 years, I am sure AT&T would like to see an end to this dispute and avoid dragging this out in court. The business does not admit any wrongdoing, but whether it did wrong or not, the moral of the story is clear: if...

US communication provider AT&T has offered to settle a class action lawsuit over disputed billing by AT&T Mobility, a business which AT&T bought in 2004. The class action lawsuit covers charges that were not authorized or understood by customers, and claims that AT&T Mobility violated consumer protection laws. Disputed charges cover a variety of services, some of which date back to 1999. There were four types of contentious charges made: for data services; for international services; a ‘universal connectivity charge’; and for phone calls charged in a billing period after the call was made. However, after 10 years the settlement offered is relatively small: between USD7 and USD10 for each type of disputed service, so that if a customer was disputing all four types of charge they would receive a total of USD33 to drop their legal claim.

You can read about the story here and visit AT&T’s settlement website here.

After 10 years, I am sure AT&T would like to see an end to this dispute and avoid dragging this out in court. The business does not admit any wrongdoing, but whether it did wrong or not, the moral of the story is clear: if customers do not understand their bill or think the charges are unfair, they persist in pursuing and punishing their provider. 10 years is not a short time in the memory of a customer, even when the dispute is worth only 10 dollars. Of course, customers normally show their unhappiness by doing something less measurable but more damaging to the long-term prospects of the provider – by churning and never coming back.

Eric Priezkalns
Eric Priezkalnshttp://revenueprotect.com

During his career, Eric has been a Director of Risk Management for a national telco, the Chief Executive of the Risk & Assurance Group, a Chief Marketing Officer for a software business, a consultant, a public speaker and the publisher of Commsrisk since its launch in 2006. Look here for more about the history of Commsrisk and the role played by Eric.

The comms providers that Eric has worked for include Qatar Telecom, Cable & Wireless, T‑Mobile, Sky and Worldcom. In addition to his proficiency at speaking about the current scamdemic, Eric is also a qualified chartered accountant and a subject matter expert in consumer protection, enterprise risk management, fraud prevention, data integrity and billing accuracy. Eric was the lead author of Revenue Assurance: Expert Opinions for Communications Providers, published by CRC Press. He can be reached through the contact form on this website.

Related Articles

The Commsrisk Global Fraud Dashboard


Our Global Fraud Dashboard uses AI-powered search to collate, update and visualize data about scams and other network abuses from around the world. New charts are added each month. See it here.

Get Our Weekly Newsletter by Email