Is OTT Direct Carrier Billing the Next Big Assurance Challenge?

If I put ‘OTT’ into a headline the article will generally be read by three times as many people. That is because the relationship between over-the-top service providers and network operators is like that between a cobra and its prey; the telcos know they are in danger but seem paralyzed, having been hypnotized by the snake. The eyes of the telco are wide open, staring at the OTT provider as it dances in front of them, but the telco is incapable of looking away or escaping the threat. One response is to try to partner with OTT players. The risk should be obvious – would you invite a snake into your bed? – but at least it is better than doing nothing. Telcos do have one major advantage: they can exploit the billing relationship with their customers to provide OTT providers with a convenient means to charge them too. For example, US customers of Netflix can pay for their service via the bills issued by cable company Comcast. Music provider Spotify has done a similar deal with UK telcos. But telcos have plenty of problems with billing their own services; they do not want to be liable for an increase in mistakes, and fraud, which could occur when charging for high-value OTT services. Will offering direct billing to OTT players cause a ramp up in the telco’s risk?

I can foresee a future where OTT direct carrier billing proves to be a healthy source of revenues that compensate the telco for the decline of some of its traditional services. I can also foresee the potential for many telcos to grab the money as quickly as possible, then find themselves liable to all sorts of losses, law suits, and compensation claims because they made themselves vulnerable to errors and frauds. Telcos will need to take an extensive, holistic view of the risks. These include:

  • Identity verification: how will the telco ensure the customer they are billing matches the customer who received the OTT service?
  • Complaints handling: the OTT provider might be responsible for a lapse in the customer’s service, but the business that does the billing will receive the complaint and the demand for a credit.
  • Recognizing fraud: it is increasingly common for fraudsters to steal TV services by gaining access to the OTT accounts of real customers. Does the telco have enough data to distinguish between the abuse of a service hijacked by a criminal, as compared to the heavy use of a family account with members who travel for work?

If you want to know how to deal with these risks, you should probably ask somebody with more relevant experience than me. One source you could turn to is WeDo Technologies. The challenges posed by OTT direct carrier billing are discussed in their latest white paper, which can be downloaded from here.

Eric Priezkalns
Eric Priezkalns
Eric is the Editor of Commsrisk. Look here for more about the history of Commsrisk and the role played by Eric.

Eric is also the Chief Executive of the Risk & Assurance Group (RAG), a global association of professionals working in risk management and business assurance for communications providers.

Previously Eric was Director of Risk Management for Qatar Telecom and he has worked with Cable & Wireless, T‑Mobile, Sky, Worldcom and other telcos. He was lead author of Revenue Assurance: Expert Opinions for Communications Providers, published by CRC Press. He is a qualified chartered accountant, with degrees in information systems, and in mathematics and philosophy.