20.5k unique visitors in the last 3 days

The Echo Is Listening; or Why We Bug Ourselves

The voice interface of the Amazon Echo leads to recordings being transmitted and stored on Amazon's servers. The police, and others, may want that data.

It is not just future Presidents staying in Russian hotels who find their rooms are bugged. People actually buy devices to bug their own homes. I refer to the Amazon Echo and similar gadgets that accept voice commands and can be used as a control hub for other devices in the home. The Amazon Echo has been retailing in the USA for a little over a year, and is slowly starting to be made available in other countries but other devices with voice interfaces, like Apple’s Siri, are already widespread. What Echo purchasers may not have considered is that the recordings of their voice are transmitted over the internet, stored on Amazon’s servers, and may then be legally obtained by an outside party, such as a law enforcement agency seeking to investigate a crime. The digital footprint created by using such devices is another way the user’s behavior may be made apparent to outsiders. And whilst the police can obtain such information by following the correct legal process, others may simply grab it because they do not respect the law.

Amazon recently received a warrant from the police in Arkansas, USA, demanding Echo recordings stored on Amazon’s server that may be pertinent to a murder case. According to Engadget, Amazon refused to comply with the warrant, stating that:

Amazon will not release customer information without a valid and binding legal demand properly served on us. Amazon objects to overbroad or otherwise inappropriate demands as a matter of course.

However, there clearly will come a time when some authority does issue a valid and binding legal demand that Amazon cannot refuse. There are many other issues raised by the potential use and misuse of such personal data, and any business which collects and stores that data will be subject to increasing burdens as a result. For a good and succinct discussion of the topic, I recommend reading this editorial in the Los Angeles Times. As the article points out, many businesses like to gather and keep such data just because it might help them run a better business than before. But every business needs to consider the potential downsides of holding on to too much customer data.

Eric Priezkalns
Eric Priezkalnshttp://revenueprotect.com

During his career, Eric has been a Director of Risk Management for a national telco, the Chief Executive of the Risk & Assurance Group, a Chief Marketing Officer for a software business, a consultant, a public speaker and the publisher of Commsrisk since its launch in 2006. Look here for more about the history of Commsrisk and the role played by Eric.

The comms providers that Eric has worked for include Qatar Telecom, Cable & Wireless, T‑Mobile, Sky and Worldcom. In addition to his proficiency at speaking about the current scamdemic, Eric is also a qualified chartered accountant and a subject matter expert in consumer protection, enterprise risk management, fraud prevention, data integrity and billing accuracy. Eric was the lead author of Revenue Assurance: Expert Opinions for Communications Providers, published by CRC Press. He can be reached through the contact form on this website.

Related Articles

1 COMMENT

Comments are closed.

The Commsrisk Global Fraud Dashboard


Our Global Fraud Dashboard uses AI-powered search to collate, update and visualize data about scams and other network abuses from around the world. New charts are added each month. See it here.

Get Our Weekly Newsletter by Email