Last year the High Court of England and Wales (Arnold J) in FAPL v BT  EWHC 480 Ch concluded that it had jurisdiction under section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act to order the blocking of access to streaming services that provide unauthorised access to protected content. In particular, unlawful streaming services that give access to live Premier League football matches could be temporarily blocked by means of a so-called ‘live blocking order’ until the end of the 2016/17 season.
In July 2017 the High Court issued a similar order for the football season that would end in May 2018. That order allowed the applicant to seek an extension of the order’s operation.
Further to such an application, this July the High Court granted the extension of the 2017 order to the 2018/19 Premier League season:  EWHC 1828 (Ch). The evidence filed by the Football Association Premier League suggests that the live blocking order was “very effective” in achieving the blocking of access to the unauthorised streaming services. Furthermore, no evidence was found of overblocking.
As suggested by the first order, a live blocking order differs from ‘standard’ blocking orders in that:
- it only comes into affect at times when Premier League matches are being broadcasted;
- it provides the list of target servers to be “re-set” each match week during the Premier League season;
- it is only applicable for a limited period that can be potentially extended; and
- in addition to the safeguards which have become standard in section 97A orders, the order requires a notice to be sent to each hosting provider each week when one of its IP addresses is subject to blocking.
Hence, the now extended ‘live blocking order’ will be in place for the next Premier League season. It will be interesting to see what other rightholders apply for such orders.